Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2013 23:09:02 GMT -6
Toronto trades
Bob Boozer
Budko
Flau
Barker
Nichols
Kappen
Merlatti
2017 Celtics 1st
Detroit trades
Connie Simmons
Ivo Daneu
John Beckman
Jim Slaughter
2017 Milano 1st
|
|
Joe
Assistant to the General Manager
Posts: 856 
|
Post by Joe on Sept 9, 2013 23:14:30 GMT -6
we really need more teams to trade Dave. Oh well, always fun trading with ya.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 9, 2013 23:24:39 GMT -6
we really need more teams to trade Dave. Oh well, always fun trading with ya. Absolutely. What would I do without you and Plossl |
|
Joe
Assistant to the General Manager
Posts: 856
|
Post by Joe on Sept 9, 2013 23:25:42 GMT -6
now i can't trade anymore. Literally stuck with what i got.
|
|
|
|
Post by Buenos Aires on Sept 10, 2013 3:49:05 GMT -6
I think Detroit gave up way way too much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil Jackson on Sept 10, 2013 5:14:13 GMT -6
Weird trade
|
|
|
|
Post by London on Sept 10, 2013 6:17:26 GMT -6
I don't love this for Toronto.
I'd have kept Boozer myself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Derek on Sept 10, 2013 6:58:22 GMT -6
I think Toronro got a ton for Boozer but I'm not sure I like it for him. Time will tell I guess.
|
|
|
|
Post by London on Sept 10, 2013 6:59:53 GMT -6
Yeah I don't understand trading for two PGs (both of who will need to be PAID) when you already have Cousy.
I'm liking this deal less and less for Toronto.
|
|
|
|
Post by Derek on Sept 10, 2013 7:11:16 GMT -6
Yeah, he got the TALENT back but he certainly has to make another trade or two.
|
|
|
|
Post by London on Sept 10, 2013 7:24:50 GMT -6
I'm just not sure what kind of value Ivo or Beckman have at this point.
Joe's been trying to move them for a while.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles on Sept 10, 2013 7:46:26 GMT -6
A weird trade for both
|
|
|
|
Post by Berlin on Sept 10, 2013 7:50:19 GMT -6
This might be the most ridiculous deal I've ever seen...we have major pieces flying everywhere seemingly helping no one. From a pure value standpoint, I think Toronto might win, but it isn't like he couldn't have gotten some young pieces that actually made sense for Boozer. This is just a mishmash of talent with no rhyme or reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by Derek on Sept 10, 2013 8:07:28 GMT -6
VOID ... LULS... Toronto almost 7 Mill over HC. (almost 8 due to his HC being 79 Mill).
|
|
|
|
Post by Berlin on Sept 10, 2013 8:11:00 GMT -6
Well, that's what happens when you deal 100 mil in contracts at 1 AM and one of the parties is likely hammered...
|
|
|
|
Post by Derek on Sept 10, 2013 8:13:37 GMT -6
Well, that's what happens when you deal 100 mil in contracts at 1 AM and one of the parties is likely hammered... IAWTP LOL |
|
|
|
Post by London on Sept 10, 2013 8:20:03 GMT -6
Well that was fun..
|
|
|
|
Post by Berlin on Sept 10, 2013 8:46:41 GMT -6
Looks like things got sorted out by adding another big name player with another big contract into the pile...that's what this deal needed to make sense for both teams.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2013 8:55:38 GMT -6
This might be the most ridiculous deal I've ever seen...we have major pieces flying everywhere seemingly helping no one. From a pure value standpoint, I think Toronto might win, but it isn't like he couldn't have gotten some young pieces that actually made sense for Boozer. This is just a mishmash of talent with no rhyme or reason. What's your point  At least I'm doing something. Three quarters of the league claim they're standing pat with their mediocre teams. Have fun people. Make trades. |
|
Joe
Assistant to the General Manager
Posts: 856
|
Post by Joe on Sept 10, 2013 9:03:20 GMT -6
IAWTP
|
|
|
|
Post by Berlin on Sept 10, 2013 9:23:20 GMT -6
Hey, you are the one who put up the thread...can't blame people for being honest with their responses.  We all like to have fun...but we are also trying to win (or are trying to lose and put ourselves in better draft positions every year if we are Craig), and I don't see how this trade does that for either team. Neither has anyone else who has commented. I guess that is the point. I might trade more than anyone...but you'll never see my reason be "blah, I'm bored so..." |
|
|
|
Post by Derek on Sept 10, 2013 9:39:46 GMT -6
I think this is more a... I am 20-14 and can't re-sign Boozer Cheap... so... PANIC TRADE!!!! AHHHHHH!!!!!!!
Yep, that is what I think.
|
|
Joe
Assistant to the General Manager
Posts: 856
|
Post by Joe on Sept 10, 2013 9:40:53 GMT -6
I absolutely have to resign boozer or its a complete loss for me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2013 10:21:52 GMT -6
Hey, you are the one who put up the thread...can't blame people for being honest with their responses. We all like to have fun...but we are also trying to win (or are trying to lose and put ourselves in better draft positions every year if we are Craig), and I don't see how this trade does that for either team. Neither has anyone else who has commented. I guess that is the point. I might trade more than anyone...but you'll never see my reason be "blah, I'm bored so..." Lol definitely not blaming you for your answer. And my reason for the trade is not just being bored - you know better than that. I absolutely believe I have a better team now than I did before. I could be wrong of course, but that's fine. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 10, 2013 10:27:03 GMT -6
I think this is more a... I am 20-14 and can't re-sign Boozer Cheap... so... PANIC TRADE!!!! AHHHHHH!!!!!!! Yep, that is what I think. Not even close. Ask John. I wanted to sign Booz to the 20 mill per year he originally asked for right away. He's the one that wanted me to slow down and negotiate it. I'm not sure you can call them panic trades when I make at least one a week. I like to trade, and I only trade if I think it benefits me. Of course I'm wrong a lot of the time but again that's the fun. |
|
