|
|
Post by Phil Jackson on Jun 4, 2014 8:18:12 GMT -6
Chicago sends
Elgin Baylor
Bob Dandridge
Bob Hopkins
Milan sends
Bob Lanier
Jan Bobrovsky
Al Bianci
|
|
|
|
Post by Berlin on Jun 4, 2014 8:25:21 GMT -6
At first I liked it for Chicago, getting more depth for their team all around without losing their best player in Hayes. Then I liked it for Milan, getting the best player in the deal and not having to worry about resigning Lanier in the offseason. So now I'll just go with even and move on.
|
|
|
|
Post by Phil Jackson on Jun 4, 2014 8:27:46 GMT -6
I think this is a very even trade.
|
|
|
|
Post by Derek on Jun 4, 2014 8:39:49 GMT -6
Chicago did what they needed but took more risk in the process. Makes sense both ways.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles on Jun 4, 2014 9:06:28 GMT -6
Hayes lanier can be scary together
|
|
|
|
Post by New York on Jun 4, 2014 10:28:08 GMT -6
In the long run, Lanier - Hayes is younger, cheaper and could end up better than the Hayes - Baylor duo. I'm a fan of building around a frontcourt and Chicago's improved a lot. I don't dislike it for Milan though, Baylor will help him win more game than Lanier I think. I don't like the Dandridge - Jan swap though so i'm not sure. I'll go even though because I don't feel this is lopsided in either direction.
|
|
|
|
Post by Washington on Jun 4, 2014 11:00:02 GMT -6
I like it for both teams, Chicago gets younger and a Lanier-Hayes duo looks pretty nasty while Baylor is a great win now player for Milan while he doesn't have his picks.
|
|
|
|
Post by Los Angeles on Jun 4, 2014 11:30:55 GMT -6
We all know the big loser in this deal is Baylor
|
|
